April 14th, 2022 
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: DB: Mobile Computing
·
·
| Exemplary | Accomplished | Developing | Beginning |
Responsiveness to discussion prompts | Points Range:36 (36.00%) - 40 (40.00%) All components of discussion prompt addressed. Well-developed viewpoint showing strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples. | Points Range:31 (31.00%) - 35 (35.00%) Most components of discussion prompt addressed logical thinking, reasoning, and/or analysis for most part; viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples. | Points Range:20 (20.00%) - 30 (30.00%) Minimal components of discussion prompt addressed Ideas expressed are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 19 (19.00%) Minimal or no components of discussion prompt addressed. Ideas expressed lack depth, are off-topic and/or confusing to follow. Viewpoint, if given, is not supported with evidence or examples. |
Application of assigned readings, etc. | Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Very clear that readings (or other materials) were understood by incorporation into postings.Incorporates sources other than those provided. | Points Range:11 (11.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Somewhat clear that readings (or other materials) were understood by incorporation into postings.Incorporates only those sources provided. | Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 14 (14.00%) Somewhat unclear that readings (or other materials) were understood by incorporation into postings. No references provided. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 9 (9.00%) Postings reflects no evidence of understanding of assigned readings (or other materials). Short statements such as “I agree with…”. No references cited. |
Writing Quality | Points Range:18 (18.00%) - 20 (20.00%) Posts show above average writing style and clear using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. 0-1 APA errors. | Points Range:15 (15.00%) - 17 (17.00%) Posts show average writing style using standard English with little grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. 2-3 APA errors | Points Range:10 (10.00%) - 14 (14.00%) Posts show an average and/or casual writing style with some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and usage. 4-5 APA errors | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 9 (9.00%) Posts show a below average/poor writing style in terms of appropriate standard English writing style, clarity, language used, and grammar. >5 APA errors |
Response to Posts | Points Range:16 (16.00%) - 20 (20.00%) All components of discussion prompt addressed. Well-developed viewpoint showing strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples other than those provided. | Points Range:11 (11.00%) - 15 (15.00%) Most components of discussion prompt addressed logical thinking, reasoning, and/or analysis for most part; viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples. | Points Range:6 (6.00%) - 10 (10.00%) Minimal components of discussion prompt addressed Ideas expressed are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant. No references cited. | Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 9 (9.00%) Minimal or no components of discussion prompt addressed. Ideas expressed lack depth, are off-topic and/or confusing to follow. Viewpoint, if given, is not supported with evidence or examples. |
Bottom of Form
Respond to Peers
Post a response to a peer who has a different viewpoint than the one you posted. Does their post change your point of view at all?
Posted in 
